perm filename PRO2[ESS,JMC] blob
sn#056865 filedate 1973-08-03 generic text, type C, neo UTF8
COMMENT ā VALID 00002 PAGES
C REC PAGE DESCRIPTION
C00001 00001
C00002 00002 TOWARDS MORE INTERACTIVE FILE BASED COMPUTING FOR STANFORD
C00010 ENDMK
Cā;
TOWARDS MORE INTERACTIVE FILE BASED COMPUTING FOR STANFORD
The subcommittee on research and instructional computing for
the Stanford campus has just begun its activities. We had expected
to spend several months determining our opinion on which way the
research and instructional interests of Stanford faculty and
students can best be advanced in the next computer procurement.
However, it seems that our hand is being forced by events -
specifically by what appears to be a decision to allocate part of
the cost of an IBM 370/158 procured at the instigation of the
Medical Center to general campus computing. Part of a 158 may be
just what the campus needs, but since the configuration was chosen
with no input from us, we are very doubtful. Besides our worry about
the results of the decision, we are also quite unhappy about the
procedure.
The following ideas should be given serious consideration:
1. The main direction in which we should look for
improvement in Stanford's next computer procurement is in greater
interactiveness.
2. This conclusion is tentative. It is not based on a
market survey and it probably shouldn't be, because the present
users of computers cannot be expected to see the possibilities for
improvement fully. The development of the steam shovel was not the
result of demand by a committee of ditch diggers. However, it is
possible to survey those parts of Stanford such as IMSS and the AI
lab that have more interactive systems and to survey those schools
that are ahead of Stanford in interactive computing.
3. We should expect to develop an ever increasing number of
computer terminals until almost every faculty and student office has
one. The Computer Science Department has already decided to go in
that direction.
4. Besides inexpensive terminals, it is important to have
inexpensive computer files. The IBM 3330 provides a basis for this.
The rent for 1,000,000 characters from IBM is about $5.00 per month.
5. It is important to have an IBM computer available in an
IBM system, because much of the national academic community will use
this machine. IBM is making progress in interactive software, but
still is far from having a system that will permit economical use by
a large community.
6. The leading community in interactive computing is that
based on the Digital Equipment PDP-10 computer, especially the ARPA
supported projects.
7. It makes sense for Stanford to have both IBM 370 and
PDP-10 capacity, and the ability to take advantage of software
developed for both machines.
8. We propose for consideration a configuration including an
IBM 370 (possibly the 158 already here) and a Digital Equipment
KI-10 or possibly KL-10 if the latter is available in time.
9. Each computer will operate with the software supplied by
its manufacturer and will remain sufficiently loyal to the
manufacturer to accept improvements in the operating system as they
are made available.
10. The two computers will share an IBM 3330 disc file. Both
operating systems allow this sharing. Each computer will also look
like a terminal to the other.
11. Besides this, the terminal system will permit a user to
connect himself to either machine according to his needs.
12. The initial emphasis will be on the PDP-10s better
interactive facilities and the 370's better batch facilities.
Neither computer will be considered a satellite of the other.
13. The cost of the proposed KI-10 system would be $700,000
plus or minus $100,000 not counting the terminal system or the 3330
disk system. A full stand-alone system with these facilities would
come to $1,400,000 including a TIP (terminal interface processor)
capable of connection to the ARPA network.
14. The operating costs depend strongly on whether Stanford
finds it possible to operate a PDP-10 without operators in a
Computation Center environment. Other PDP-10 systems are operated
this way but not in a computation center environment. Because a lot
of money depends on it, this needs careful investigation.
15. We estimate that a KI-10 will be able to give good
service to 100 simultaneously logged in users and a KL-10 to 200.
However, this depends a good deal on what the users are trying to
do.
It should again be emphasized that the subcommittee has not
had time to reach definite conclusions, but the subcommittee has
reached the consensus that this direction should not be precluded by
decisions taken at the administrative level.